Caesarstone.co.il · Page-Level Audit

Caesarstone.co.il — Comprehensive Page-Level Audit

Every Hebrew page of the Israeli site — 660 pages — with its own full report: measured data + prioritized recommendations. Click any row to open the page's report (each has its own URL).
660 pages · 100% coverage 2,932 recommendations audit date 2026-10-01 read-only · no site changes
9
CRITICAL pages
417
HIGH priority pages
118
MEDIUM
72
indexable pages with ZERO internal links
60
money pages with no inbound links (orphans)
16–20s
mobile LCP (homepage, lab)
10.9MB
homepage weight (mobile)
100
product pages without Product schema
820
broken backlinks (10.6%)
#1
AI-recommendation position in Israel (mention rate 70.5%)
67%
of AI citations about the brand come from third parties, not the site
33.5K
Google clicks (90d, Search Console)
26.5K
monthly impressions leaking at <1% CTR on 3 pages

§All 660 pages — click to open a page's full report

severitytypepagewordslinks outlinks inopen
⬇ Download the full CSV (660 rows · all data + all recommendations)

01Site overview

What was examined

Every public content type of www.caesarstone.co.il was enumerated and pulled in full — 666 URLs, of which 660 are the Hebrew pages covered here (English-only pages and the separately-managed studio subdomain are summarized below instead). For each page: title & meta description, indexing & canonical, content depth, headings, keyword density, outgoing/incoming internal links with anchor text, images & alt text, structured data, social preview data, duplication, freshness — and a prioritized recommendation list.

Pages by typeInspiration gallery: 148 · Blog post: 119 · product: 108 · Catalog / product: 100 · Page: 81 · FAQ: 53 · Collections gallery: 27 · Collection & material: 9 · Process guide: 7 · Style story: 7 · Project: 1 Indexable / noindex533 indexable · 127 noindex Severity spreadCRITICAL 9 · HIGH 417 · MEDIUM 118 · LOW 3 · INFO 113

Studio subdomain (studio.caesarstone.co.il) — summary

The B2B designer portal carries 1,019 URLs, 100% noindexed (correct for a portal with cart/checkout/3D tooling). Two findings matter for the main site: 194 slugs exist on both properties (97 catalog + 85 product + 12 pages; 46 pairs byte-identical) and one content bug — studio's /catalog/508-isobellia/ serves lucillia content. While studio stays noindexed there is no Google conflict, but add studio→www canonicals as defense-in-depth before any future indexation.

02Key site-wide findings

A. Performance (mobile, measured 2026-10-01)

Largest Contentful Paint16.1–19.9 s (target ≤ 2.5 s) Total Blocking Time2.4–2.8 s (target ≤ 0.2 s) Time to Interactive34–39 s First Contentful Paint2.3–11.0 s (target ≤ 1.8 s) Cumulative Layout Shift0 ✓ Server response (TTFB)20 ms ✓ — hosting/CDN are fine Page weight10.9 MB per page (target < 2 MB) Unused JavaScript~2.2 MB removable (≈6–8.5 s) Real-user field dataAVERAGE — the lab numbers are worse than the field median, meaning weak devices/mobile networks suffer most

Diagnosis: the server responds instantly; the problem is front-end weight — page-builder + 3D-visualizer JavaScript shipping site-wide, unoptimized images, and heavy main-thread work. Fix order: (1) load the 3D/visualizer bundle only on pages that use it; (2) WebP/AVIF images + responsive sizes + lazy-loading; (3) purge unused CSS/JS and defer non-critical scripts; (4) long-cache static assets; (5) fix production console errors; (6) re-measure weekly until LCP ≤ 2.5 s in the field.

B. Titles & meta descriptions

C. Internal linking

D. Structured data

E. Content & freshness

F. Search visibility (google.co.il, Hebrew, 2026-10-01)

QueryIntentcaesarstone.co.il positionsVerdict
אבן קיסרbrand#4 (homepage, live check) — but GSC avg position 1.1–1.3 with 49.9% CTR on the homepageLive-SERP vs GSC gap: the homepage usually ranks #1, but at check time own pages (/project-checklist/, a gallery page) sat above it — brand SERP dilution is intermittent; consolidate with sitelinks-worthy structure
caesarstonebrand (EN)#2 (homepage)Global caesarstone.* domains hold the rest — expected
משטחי קוורץcategory#1 (/caesarstone-quartz/)✓ money keyword won
שיש למטבחcategory#1 (/catalog/) + #6 (blog)✓ but the duplicate-title pair threatens this
משטח אבן קיסר מחירcommercialABSENT from top 30A third-party fabricator (la-casa.co.il, "Caesarstone Group B") captures this buying-intent brand query at #4. Build a pricing/where-to-buy page targeting it.
אבן קיסר קטלוגnavigational#1 + #2✓

AI Overviews appear on 4 of 6 queries. With no Product/FAQ schema, no llms.txt and thin FAQ answers, the brand has no structured footprint in the AI answer layer for its own market (see GEO below).

G. Backlinks & authority (measured 2026-10-01)

Total backlinks7,725 Referring domains568 (512 main domains) Broken backlinks820 (10.6%) → 44 broken on-site targets Spam scorelow ✓ Link types81% image links · only 1,433 anchor-text links — thin contextual profile Top referrerscaesarstone.com / .us / .ca / .in / .co.za / .com.au … — overwhelmingly the corporate family; genuine third-party Israeli editorial links are a small fraction (.co.il: 505)

Actions: (1) broken-link reclamation — 301 the 44 dead targets, contact high-authority referrers with corrected URLs; (2) digital-PR for contextual anchor links from Israeli design/real-estate media; (3) competitor-gap analysis vs Silestone/Dekton IL.

H. AI visibility — MEASURED (Israel scope, 30-day window, data refreshed 2026-10-01)

#1
overall position in AI engine recommendations (IL)
70.5%
brand mention rate across AI answers (71.5% latest, 2026-10-01)
2.8
avg. rank when mentioned (improving → 2.5)
0.2
sentiment score (positive, -0.02 vs previous period)

The brand leads AI answers in Israel — but the lead is thin and eroding at the edges. Competitor standings over the same window:

BrandPositionMention rateAvg. rankNote
Caesarstone#170.5%2.8own brand
Dekton#265.2%3.1gap of 5.3 pts — closing fast
Laminam#355.9%4.1—
Cosentino#434.1%3.9—
Silestone#530.0%4.4—

Dekton is 5.3 points behind and rising — and the tracked AI answers about Dekton comparisons repeatedly cite third-party comparison pages (14.9% of comparison answers cite one source alone). Every comparison question ("Caesarstone vs Dekton", "quartz vs porcelain") is currently answered by OTHER sites' content, not yours.

Who the AI engines cite when Caesarstone comes up (30d, IL)

#Cited sourceCitation weightMost-cited URL
1Caesarstone Israel (caesarstone.co.il)27.9%https://www.caesarstone.co.il/caesarstone-quartz/
2Midrag (midrag.co.il)5.0%https://www.midrag.co.il/Expanel/Question/193
3Caesarstone (caesarstone.com)4.4%https://www.caesarstone.com/care-maintenance/quartz-mineral-surfaces/
4BonimBayit (bonimbayit.co.il)4.0%https://bonimbayit.co.il/kitchen-countertops-comparison/
5Marom Cohen & Co. Law Office (marblecohen.co.il)3.8%https://marblecohen.co.il/
6Live In Style (liveinstyle.co.il)2.5%https://liveinstyle.co.il/rating/%D7%90%D7%99%D7%96%D7%94-%D7%A9%D7%99%D7%A9-%D7
7Jan Marble (jan-marble.co.il)2.3%https://jan-marble.co.il/%D7%93%D7%A7%D7%98%D7%95%D7%9F-%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%9C-%D7%A
8Marble Elchai (marble-elchai.co.il)2.2%https://www.marble-elchai.co.il/%D7%93%D7%A7%D7%98%D7%95%D7%9F-%D7%95%D7%A2%D7%9
9Slabwise (slabwise.com)2.1%https://slabwise.com/questions/quartz-brands
10Marble Itzik (marble-itzik.co.il)2.0%https://www.marble-itzik.co.il/
11Oran Levy Website (oran-levy.co.il)1.9%https://oran-levy.co.il/types/caesars-stone/
12Consumer Reports (consumerreports.org)1.7%https://www.consumerreports.org/home-garden/countertops/best-countertops-for-bus

Read this table carefully: the #1 source is caesarstone.co.il itself (27.9% — led by /caesarstone-quartz/, /faq/, /blog/marble-kitchen-tops/). But positions #2–#15 are distributors, fabricators and comparison sites (midrag.co.il, bonimbayit.co.il, jan-marble.co.il, marble-elchai.co.il, liveinstyle.co.il…). The AI answer layer about YOUR brand is 2/3 controlled by resellers and third parties. On the global (US) battery the same pattern holds: caesarstoneus.com pages get cited, caesarstone.co.il gets zero global citations — and the editorial domains that shape answers (thespruce.com, slabwise.com, consumerreports.org, lifestoryresearch.com) have no IL equivalent on your side.

Source momentum (90 days)

Rising citers
  • Jan Marble (jan-marble.co.il) — 0.1% → 1.8% (+1638.9%)
  • ZIV Automation (zivltd.com) — 0.1% → 0.7% (+596.3%)
  • Cosentino (cosentino.com) — 0.3% → 1.5% (+459.4%)
  • Homes & Gardens (homesandgardens.com) — 0.2% → 1.3% (+430.0%)
  • Caesarstone (caesarstone.com) — 0.2% → 1.1% (+344.0%)
  • Polostone (polostone.co.il) — 0.3% → 1.0% (+290.2%)
  • Consumer Reports (consumerreports.org) — 0.2% → 0.8% (+249.7%)
  • Mamlechet Hashayish (mamlechet-hashayish.com) — 0.3% → 1.2% (+245.0%)
Falling citers
  • Even Marble (even-marble.co.il) — 1.0% → 0.0% (-100.0%)
  • Top Best Stone (topbeststone.com) — 0.5% → 0.0% (-100.0%)
  • Wikipedia (wikipedia.org) — 0.5% → 0.0% (-95.3%)
  • Fixr (fixr.com) — 0.7% → 0.0% (-95.1%)
  • Darkstone Natural Stone (darkstone.co.il) — 0.5% → 0.1% (-89.5%)
  • i-Marble (i-marble.co.il) — 1.1% → 0.1% (-87.1%)
  • Chef Center (sheff.co.il) — 0.5% → 0.1% (-77.8%)
  • Ben-Eli Law Office (ben-eli.co.il) — 0.6% → 0.1% (-77.0%)

Notable declines: wikipedia.org (-95%), reddit.com (-72%), realsimple.com (-76%) — the trust-layer sources that AI engines weight heavily are citing Caesarstone LESS than 90 days ago. New entrant: la-casa.co.il (the same reseller that captures your price query in Google — it is now entering the AI answer layer too).

The measured action list (17 open items)

Action typeCountImpact/EffortTriggering source
** comparison_page4High/Medium** Marble Elchai
** create_how_to4High/Medium** Infinity Surfaces
** create_blog_post3High/Medium** Laminam Israel
** create_what_is2High/Medium** Laminam Israel
** create_listicle2Medium/Medium** Marble Elchai
** update_robots_txt1High/Low** Caesarstone Israel
** faq_missing1Medium/Low** Caesarstone Israel

Two items are flagged High-impact / Low-effort and corroborate the crawl findings independently: robots.txt blocks parts of the site from AI systems (see §I) and there is no consolidated FAQ surface for the core money queries (שיש למטבח, שיש קוורץ, שיש פורצלן, משטח למטבח) — the 53 FAQ fragments are not recognized as an FAQ entity because they lack FAQPage schema (see §D). The comparison-page items name the exact third-party pages winning the "vs Dekton / vs Cosentino / vs Laminam" answers.

What a tracked global AI answer actually says (sample, 2026-10-01)

"What are the best-reviewed countertop brands for home renovations?" — the engine shortlisted Caesarstone #1 ("strong consumer trust, extensive designs, established brand"), citing a 2026 consumer-trust study. All 5 Caesarstone citations in that answer were caesarstoneus.com pages; none from the .co.il site. The engines also volunteered the caveat that "the fabricator/installer can matter as much as the brand" — which is precisely the message your Israeli distributors' pages are positioned to shape.

H2. Google Search Console — the site's own numbers (connected property)

33,540
clicks (90 days)
529,493
impressions (90 days)
7,418
clicks (28 days, all devices)
9.8
avg. position (28d, by-page)

Top queries (28d)

QueryClicksImpr.CTRPos.
אבן קיסר9061,62455.8%1.3
שיש קיסר34993037.5%2.1
אבן קיסר קטלוג29453754.7%4.7
שיש למטבח1152,0865.5%2.5
שיש קיסר קטלוג9432129.3%8
שיש851,7974.7%4.9
שיש אבן קיסר8139320.6%5.2
שיש קיסר קטלוג מחירים7333621.7%7.6
אבן קיסר שירות לקוחות3410034%17.5
קיסר291,3012.2%6.6
tci ehxr283580%1
אבן קיסר בני ברק2716216.7%2.6

Device split (28d)

DeviceClicksImpr.CTRPos.
MOBILE4,74665,8007.2%6.9
DESKTOP2,62467,2963.9%14.5
TABLET485808.3%8.1

Mobile earns 64% of clicks with position 6.9; desktop sits at 14.5. The performance disaster in §A is hitting exactly the device that converts — every second shaved off LCP protects this split.

Rich-result presence

Only appearance type registered: VIDEO (216 impressions, position 44.8). Zero FAQ, Product, Breadcrumb or Review rich results in 28 days — direct confirmation of §D: the schema simply is not there to be shown.

Query → page mapping (28d): אבן קיסר lands on the homepage at 49.9% CTR ✓ · שיש למטבח (1,931 impressions, the biggest non-brand term) lands on /catalog/ at 5.7% CTR and on /project/שיש-למטבחים/ at 1% CTR from position 11.2 with 8,597 impressions — the single largest click-leakage page on the site. /blog/kitchen-island-ideas/ (9,603 impr., 0.6% CTR) and /blog/marble-kitchen-tops/ (8,286 impr., 0.6% CTR) leak the same way. These three pages = ~26,500 impressions/month converting at <1%: title/snippet rewrites here are worth more than any other on-page change.

Per-page GSC data is merged into the page reports below: 49 pages carry their own clicks/impressions/CTR/position card (§10 of each report) + performance-driven recommendations.

I. Technical & security notes

03Prioritized action plan

P0 — this week

  1. Homepage title "Home Page" → branded Hebrew keyword title + meta description.
  2. Fix broken titles: /icon/ ("ICON"), /new_porcelain/ ("GAP"), /contact-us/ (7 chars).
  3. Fix the mobile viewport flag + production console errors.
  4. Add meta descriptions to the 13 indexable pages missing them.
  5. Resolve the "שיש למטבחים" blog-vs-page duplicate (merge + 301).
  6. Fix the isobellia/lucillia content bug (studio twin) and the 3 canonical mismatches (verify /catalog-ar/ intent).
  7. Build a pricing/"where to buy" page targeting "משטח אבן קיסר מחיר" — currently lost to a reseller.
  8. CTR-leak triage (GSC-measured): rewrite titles/snippets on the 3 biggest leaking pages — /project/שיש-למטבחים/ (8,597 impr. @ 1% CTR), /blog/kitchen-island-ideas/ (9,603 @ 0.6%), /blog/marble-kitchen-tops/ (8,286 @ 0.6%). ~26.5K monthly impressions converting below 1% — largest single click-gain available.
  9. Unblock AI crawlers: the measured action list flags robots.txt blocking key sections from AI systems — audit the robots directives and allow the money paths (High impact / Low effort).

P1 — this month

  1. Schema program: Product (catalog), FAQPage (53 FAQs), Article (119 posts), Organization site-wide — template-level. GSC confirms zero rich results except VIDEO in 28 days.
  2. Consolidated FAQ surface for the money queries (שיש למטבח, שיש קוורץ, שיש פורצלן, משטח למטבח) — the 53 fragments are not recognized as an FAQ entity.
  3. Internal-linking program: related-content modules in blog/catalog/FAQ templates; de-orphan the 60 money pages; rebalance equity from /warranty to catalog hubs.
  4. Performance sprint 1: conditional-load the 3D/visualizer bundle; WebP/AVIF + lazy images; purge unused CSS/JS → target LCP < 4 s. Mobile = 64% of clicks (position 6.9 mobile vs 14.5 desktop) — this protects the majority of search revenue.
  5. Rewrite the 52 over-length and 216 under-length titles (indexable first), prioritizing the high-impression/low-CTR pages flagged in each page's §10 card.
  6. Expand top 20 FAQs to 150–300 words, answer-first format.
  7. Decide cnm/* indexation; verify page-builder content is server-rendered on catalog pages.
  8. Own the comparison answers: publish first-party "Caesarstone vs Dekton / vs Laminam / vs Cosentino" and "quartz vs porcelain" comparison pages — third-party comparison pages currently appear in ~15% of the AI answers on these questions, and Dekton's mention rate (65.2%) is 5.3 points behind and rising.

P2 — this quarter

  1. Performance to LCP ≤ 2.5 s field: code-splitting, caching, legacy-JS purge; weekly regression measurements.
  2. GEO program: llms.txt, AI-crawler policy, AI-answer monitoring, citation-share target — cut the third-party citation share (currently ~2/3 of AI citations about the brand) by growing owned-page citations beyond the current 27.9%.
  3. Trust-layer reclamation: wikipedia/reddit/realsimple citations fell 72–95% over 90 days — targeted digital-PR to restore them; monitor la-casa.co.il-style resellers entering the answer layer.
  4. Blog refresh: 79 pre-2024 posts — update/merge/prune; quarterly cadence.
  5. Broken-backlink reclamation (820 links / 44 targets) + digital-PR for contextual Israeli media links.
  6. Studio strategy: cross-subdomain canonicals; decide if B2B landing pages should index.